-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter wrote:
| On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:00:17 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
|> Actually, portage-2.1 has seen an improvement in this area.  In addition,
|> I have written a patch that obsoletes the metadata transfer.  That's
|> right, no metadata transfer necessary. :)
|>
|> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/1602
|>
|> Zac
| | Thank you. I will take a look. It sure _looks_ simple and logical enough.
| I don't know enough about portage though to understand! Will it work with
| < pre?. I have x86 portage installed, not ~x86.
|
No, you need a 2.1_pre release due to cache changes that my patch relies on (a 
backport would not really be worth the trouble IMO).  Hopefully the 2.1 branch 
will be stable soon enough though.

Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDuXbx/ejvha5XGaMRAsVUAKCfDlOg8aloPHwgxeG2tQIYt0MnuACfe8zH
ApZjRceyt6uL/g64T7heGmM=
=KERa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to