Martin Eisenhardt wrote:
> On Thursday February 16 2006 16:30, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
>> > control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
>>
>> Right.
>>
>
> No, wrong, please see my other message.
Okay.
> You *can* tell LVM where to put LVs but you do not *have* to.
But how do you actually do that? Or are you talking about
the "allocation policy"? Like "--contiguous y"?
Alexander Skwar
--
It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails,
admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something.
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
--
[email protected] mailing list
