> Well I think ~x86 is generally usable, but you do have to be a bit
> more cautious.  For example, I don't mind --sync every day, but I tend
> to delay any updates that involve portage, baselayout, or other
> lowlevel system packages until Friday nights, after making a backup,
> so I have the whole weekend to pickup the pieces if something should
> break.

I agree fully. That doesn't make it any less frustrating when things go
wrong ;-)

I am fairly cautious. I've learned to not upgrade my servers unless needed,
and I use my notebook as the "testing ground". But there are still slight
differences that cause me headaches here and there.

I've also found that doing these upgrades during the week-days, it's easier
to get someone to respond on the list. Friday night and weekends tend to
have a delay till Monday -- where your email gets lost in a sea of others
and deleted. During the week, people are monitoring their inbox more
frequently and theres a better chance of a reply.

Plus I do this while at my work, so I have another computer to use to get
online and send emails with, if I hose my notebook (like the past few days )
;-)

> And today I think if you encounter anything stable that depends on a
> ~x86 package, it is a bug, and should be filed as such.

Well, again, that was a while ago, and now I'm used to the package.keywords
file...

> > My file is empty?! :(
> 
> >
> > Is there a way to rebuild this file?
> 
> The job of depscan.sh is to rebuild this file.  But if the file exists
> and is newer than the configuration in /etc, it will not do anything,
> even it if deptree is empty.  So delete deptree, and run depscan.sh
> again with the --debug option.  You should see a bit more happen.

Good to know for future reference.

> > How did this happen?
> 
> A badly timed Ctrl-alt-del or reboot could be the culprit.  There is a
> window of opportunity while depscan is running that if it is aborted,
> will leave you with an empty file.

Ah. Well glad to know it's not anything that couldn't be rebuilt. It seems
that 'baselayout' did that for me.


As always Richard, I think you for your patience and knowledge. 

I also really got a kick out of your name/email address... So CLEVER! :D


d

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to