-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote:
> On 03/04/06, Kurt Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mick wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't the second device have a different BusID No? >>> Something like 1:0:1 >> >> Yes, if you have two different devices. It's a laptop, so the >> video has two ports for same device. It worked fine under xorg >> 6.? . >> >> --Kurt > > > Hmm, I don't know then. :-( > > If I remember correctly mine has one device (i.e. one video card) > but two ports, which are identified differently. Perhaps its worth > giving it a try. Some (All? Sorry, covering arse here) cards (e.g. Saphire radeon 9600 - - whch uses an rv350 chip) have two PCI id's covering the same physcial card. I originally asked about this back when the r300 project started. Apparently Windows requires the two pci id's in order to see the two CRT controllers that the cards have. X ignores it & accesses everything via the first pci id. (In fact IIRC X doesn't even work through the second head pci id at all, so don't even try to use it). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEQMIl/3QXwQQkZYwRAnKmAKCrwOXquJYFm1Y/BOp6NZxSkmyxBwCfWspY rwnciC7U6G1MLrZIeCm95Ek= =upPe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
