Richard Fish wrote:
On 4/19/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We did it in the correct order. He's rebooted into Linux (sans LiveCD)
and says he has network. I'd still like to know how
if /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is pointing to /etc/init.d/net.eth0, how does
AFAIK both net.eth0 and net.eth1 should be symbolic links to net.lo.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=1
The handbook has a slight gramattical error in the description, but
the command given:
ln -s net.lo net.eth0
will create a symbolic link named net.eth0 pointing at net.lo.
-Richard
The scripts are the same, but they use different parts of the config files.
BTW: disregard my previous post i hadn't seen the problem was fixed
(it's late here).
Maxime
--
[email protected] mailing list
