Farhan Ahmed wrote: > Even when my system was running glibc-2.4-r1 the UTF-8 denomination was > .utf8..
Maybe with -r1, both denominations were correct. That might be true.
But with -r2, only .utf8 is correct.
Or, if .UTF-8 was wrong in -r1, then no application and the glibc
didn't know about this and behaved wrong. This might also be the
case :)
Alexander Skwar
--
QOTD:
"If I'm what I eat, I'm a chocolate chip cookie."
--
[email protected] mailing list
