Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Sven Köhler wrote:
>> (snip)
>>
>> > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales?
>>
>> 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1
>
> No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales.
That might be. Then I wonder, why I had no problems with .UTF-8
when I was using 2.4-r1. As I wrote, it might be, that my system
was misbehaving, as it accepted .UTF-8 just fine.
Alexander Skwar
--
QOTD:
"If I'm what I eat, I'm a chocolate chip cookie."
--
[email protected] mailing list
