On Mon, 8 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 23:21, Tero Grundström wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
I went 250Hz a long time ago, and it did not hurt me in any way. But I am
also only using vanilla kernels without patches ;)
Whether its patched or vanilla should make no difference in this case.
using a different scheduler like in the ck-patches could make a difference.
Yes I suppose it could. My point is only that 1000Hz is the officially
recommended setting for a desktop machine even for the vanilla sources.
--
T.G.
