-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:39 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Ow Mun Heng wrote: >>> Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows >>> 2.14. >>> >> Well, >> According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is >> the development build. 2.16 doesn't exist, that is probably why its not >> in portage ;-) >> >> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning > > > Arrgh.. Crap.. Sorry for the noise. (Bad Hair day today) > > So.. I believe the correct question is .. when will Gentoo unmask > Gnome-2.14? When is the timeline? > > (I know I can unmask it myself, but that's not something I want to do) >
Packages get marked stable 30 days after the last resolved bug (unofficial knowledge, but I believe it is correct) There are quite afew bugs so I bet it will be awhile yet before it is marked stable: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=gnome&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=gnome&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=gnome&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=gnome&field1-0-0=product&type1-0-0=substring&value1-0-0=2.14&field1-0-1=component&type1-0-1=substring&value1-0-1=2.14&field1-0-2=short_desc&type1-0-2=substring&value1-0-2=2.14&field1-0-3=status_whiteboard&type1-0-3=substring&value1-0-3=2.14 - -- Jeremy Olexa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Office: EE/CS 1-201 CS/IT Systems Staff University of Minnesota -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEgQssFN7pD9kMi/URAh9ZAJwK63VEfUdfhrIoP0hyP5Q91sCdHACaAr3y 18p6SSPWS+13TAiBCXGIQ5c= =Nz5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
