On 6/13/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 16:12:48 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:

> I first guess is to unmerge everything KDE, but even then, I'm not quite
> sure

Not everything KDE, leave arts and any other dependencies
> what I should emerge in its place.  kde-meta?  And what will my system
> be capable of in the meantime?  Is there some subset that will get my
> desktop back in working order relatively quickly  (would "emerge
> konsole kalarm" do? What's the name of the app that displays a
> panel/taskbar).

"emerge -1av kdebase-meta" will bring in a basic KDE desktop, including
what you mention.

"emerge -1av konsole kwin kicker pager kalarm" is quicker and should
give you what you need. either way, follow it up with "emerge kde-meta"
or pick and choose the packages you want rather than installing
everything KDE, it's one of the advantages of the split ebuilds.

> Dang, but this is a lot to figure out and trust that
> I've got it right while I destroy my ability to
> ask for help if I get it wrong.

You use gmail, so as long as you have a desktop (twm is included with
xorg) and a browser (firefox?) you can communicate.

This is good to hear, but it's entirely theoretical from my point of view.  How
would I find out about turning off KDE and turning on twm?  I'd like to
practice this before I destroy my system.  Real soon now, in fact, because
(see separate posting) my system seems to be crumbling as I write this.

Parenthetically, gmail is just where I direct all my email subscriptions.
I'm not so happy with their privacy policies, but there's nothing personal
here and I like being able to search an archive of the stuff I get.  600 MB
and growning, and it's free (so far).

> What's the name of the gizmo that puts the clock in my panel/taskbar?
> Is that
> a panel or a taskbar, and will a mistake in terminology prevent my
> system from
> ever looking like this again?  Is there some little gizmo I'm used to
> using that
> will suddenly disappear, and how will I know what its name anyway when
> I can no longer see it?

If you emerge kde-meta, you'll have everything that the monolithic kde
ebuild gave you, just in manageable bite-sized chunks.

Hmph.  You call 300 separate ebuilds manageable?  I suppose it is if
you meta them in as a chunk.  So the payoff is in not recompiling them all
when one changes?  I guess that's reasonable.  Un-humph.

Thanks.  You just convinced me.

--
Neil Bothwick

Like Entropy, bugs can only be created, not destroyed.


--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

Reply via email to