-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi David,

David Klempner wrote:
 > Note that without doing *anything*, with a normal 3G/1G split, you'll
> actually get 896M. Recent kernels added in a config option to have a
> 2.75G/1.25G split, which solves this problem; it makes sense to use that
> if you have 1G of RAM.

This option must be really new because I don't have it. I have two 3/1
options, a 2/2 option and a 1/3 option. Either way, I'm now using 2GB.

> My understanding is that the performance hit from enabling high memory
> support is actually fairly small; if you have more than 1G (where the
> fix is unlikely to break anything) it's not worth worrying about.

> My guesses is, as has already been suggested, that something is messed
> up with your video driver. Did you recompile it when you recompile your
> kernel? Is acceleration still working at all? Do you get the current
> performance issues either without the extra RAM with a highmem kernel or
> with the extra RAM without a highmem or 2G/2G kernel?

Maybe this is the case, I'm not sure. For testing some other software I
upgraded to 2.16.6.16 2 weeks ago (when I still had 1GB) which resulted
in the same problem. I then went back to the previous-compiled 2.6.16.5
version which worked flawlessly. It is only now that I have actually
rebuilt the 2.6.16.5 kernel (due to RAM upgrade) and am having the same
problem. The NVidial kernel and glx (to be sure) were also rebuilt.

I did a bit of testing last night before I went to bed and it seems that
no matter what options I use in the kernel I'm getting bad performance
now from the graphics card. It still gets > 4000 fps with glxgears
though, so I'm not 100% sure it is the graphics card.

The question I was meaning to ask is what the ideal kernel settings
should be for 2GB of RAM... from there I'll look for other explanations
why the 3d isn't performing well.

Should I use 2/2 *and* highmem, or just 2/2 ? You suggest the highmem
does very little, but it's there for a valid reason I take it.

Thanks for the answers,
Ralph
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEljNWCt0ZF9kLPvYRArMnAJ49+k5iZbZGr+UBiPOMtYCDzpJ0QgCghWkt
KHDb0KCFbAnyyAQGymJvd70=
=Weyw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to