Dale wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Dale wrote: >> >> >>> I thought it was ccache? I did this a while back too. Is this >>> something else we can use in addition to ccache? >>> >> >> confcache caches the results of all those ./configure runs, so that, >> in theory, a check would only be done once. This would indeed speedup >> ./cnfigure runs. >> >> ccache caches compiled "stuff". If you recompile a package (or a similar >> package), not everything has to be compiled again. >> >> Alexander Skwar >> > So I need to add this too huh?? I'll have to check into this. I'm all > for speed. < zoom >
Well, *need* - dunno. It's nice, but it's rather error prone, as there are too many "broken" packages out there. That's why confcache is now p.masked. Alexander Skwar -- Zoe: "Sir, I think you have a problem with your brain being missing." -- [email protected] mailing list
