-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:08:41 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: > >> I'm seeing the same. The amount of missing mails doesn't qualify for >> "lots", but I'm missing some.
When several mails on a daily basis continue to "go missing", over a period of weeks, I call that lots. If each mail missing was a nut or bolt used to put together your car (or in my case archive them accordingly in a database), it becomes "lots" ;-) > I see the same. I've seen quite a few replies to mails I never received. Yes, this is what first caught my eye, the secondly being the software I wrote not positively finding threads, and now and then not finding the first message to the new thread (as Neil writes above). The strange thing is gmane seems to be receiving all the mail, or at least 99% of it ~ so why gmane and not us? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEyKMWCt0ZF9kLPvYRAiPJAKCHutev8Jxbw4ffV+GlEGtNe/81mACfYRZt b3t+Rn8g+k+aAdrNnYxIGRA= =3rtx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
