On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote: > > > > My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart > > > enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly. > > > > > Here, here. > > Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time. I'm all for leaving it as > it is, 99% of the time, replies to the list's posts should go back to the > list. > Neil, my reply was not a two word discourse on how Reply-To should be handled by list software, but merely a comment on Nick's choice of MUI.
festus -- Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
pgpONcBhMoDl0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
