Michael Hennebry wrote: >>>>> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2 >>>>> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by >>>>> toolchain.eclass. > > Perhaps I misunderstood the preceeding. > I'd taken it to mean that recompiling any package with gentoo tools > would result in -Os being replaced by -O2 .
AFAI understood the preceeding Richard wrote: "on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are ... " I interpret this as: emerge gcc with CFLAGS containing -Os get gcc compiled with -O2 Not "any package", gcc (due to toolchain.eclass ...). My way of seeing this, corrections welcome. >> Being the OP in this case, I want to state that I didn't want "-Os for >> all pkgs". I just decided to set "-Os" inside my CFLAGS, and I am >> perfectly happy with any working gcc resulting from this. > > A statement quoted above suggested to me that > you were unlikely to get -Os for anything. Earlier in this thread I went -O3, then -O2, now -Os ... As I stated several times, I learn. Greets, Stefan. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
