On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:52 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not > > stable > > yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use?
I've been using it ever since it made ~x86, through to the current -r5, and it looks fine (as do all kernels recently :) I've tried radeonfb, vesafb-tng, suspend to disk, and others... > So I guess what is really needed here is for someone that actually > uses it to file a stabilization bug request along with the emerge > --info and some system specs. done. I've never submitted a stabilisation bug before, but FTFE (first time for everything :) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146333 cya, -- Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat. -- R. Heinlein -- [email protected] mailing list
