On 9/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This would be a real problem for install, as it would result in the
> source tree being removed and recreated...obviuosly in an unconfigured
> and uncompiled state.
>
> This is odd, and I'm still looking for the solution...
>

And may be why there is no recent ebuild of samba.

Nope.  I get the same effect with samba-3.0.23a and samba-3.0.23, both
in the portage tree.

Looks like the problem comes from the samba-3-gentoo-0.3.14.tar.bz2
archive, which contains an entry for "./" dated from 2005-10-06.  This
causes the work directory to have that date when the archive is
extracted, and confuses ebuild a bit because the distfile now has a
more recent date than workdir, so it thinks it needs to recreate
workdir.

You can work around this problem by running "ebuild ... merge",
"ebuild ... package", or just "emerge =net-fs/samba-3.0.23c".

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146801

-Richard
--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to