On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:28, ellotheth rimmwen wrote:
> On 9/19/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, why do I have two gnupg's, can I umerge the earliest of them?
> > =============================================
> > [I--] [  ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.5 (0)
> > [I--] [  ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.20-r3 (1.9)
> > =============================================
>
> From the 1.9.20 release announcement[1]:
>
> -------------
> We are pleased to announce the availability of GnuPG 1.9.20 - the
> branch of GnuPG featuring the S/MIME protocol.  You should consider
> using GnuPG 1.9 if you want to use the GPG-AGENT or GPGSM.  The
> GPG-AGENT is also helpful when using the stable GPG version 1.4 or if
> you want to check out its ssh-agent replacement feature.
>
> GnuPG 1.9 is the current development version of GnuPG.  Despite of
> that, most parts (in particular GPG-AGENT and GPGSM) are considered
> ready for production use. Please keep on using GnuPG 1.4.x for
> OpenPGP; 1.9 and 1.4 may - and actually should - be installed
> simultaneously.
> -------------
>
> [1] http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2005q4/000209.html

Cool!  Thank you.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: pgpQCEKH8aIHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to