On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:26, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:39:56 -0800, Bryan Green wrote: > > > Because equery isn't really being maintained. Lets just say it leaves > > > a lot of room for improvement... Feel free to supply patches to improve > > > it... > > > > Not maintained? I thought it was the tool of choice for what it does. > > I thought it was intended to replace the 'q' utilities. > > It's more the other way round.
If I recall correctly Bryan is right about that there was a time when equery was being pushed as the grand replacement for the portage-utils. I think portage-utils has improved since then and as the gentoolkit bugs has accumulated portage-utils does seem superior for a number of purposes... > To answer the original question, use "qsize -a" Ahh, thanks - I always tend to forget that.. ;) -- Bo Andresen
pgpS68sWVkBjv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
