On 2006-12-29, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> how about media-sound/audacious ?
>>>> its a nice and lightweight player.
>>>
>>> Lightweight??
>>>
>>> It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
>>> virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M. The only
>>> thing with a slightly larger resident size is the X server.
>>>
>>> Audacious takes three times as much memory as Apache.
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 10124 michael 15 0 113m 30m 22m R 0.5 4.9 0:02.38 amarokapp
Damn. Compared to that, I guess audacious is lightweight. I
probably need to re-calibrate my "weight-meter".
> and that's when it's not playing anything! When streaming the
> %CPU goes up to 8.5-9.0.
>
> I'm missing xmms too. I hope xmms2 will eventually be
> developed enough to use as a stable package, but without the
> bloatware that winamp has become.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Should I get
at locked in the PRINCICAL'S
visi.com OFFICE today -- or have
a VASECTOMY??
--
[email protected] mailing list
