Hello, On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Bob Young wrote: > Now with regards to eth1, it is my intent to configure eth1 as with the > machines only public IP address (69.12.134.79), and configure BIND to listen > on eth1 as a secondary domain name server, the primary domain name server > would have an "A Record" for 69.12.134.79 and it would be named > ns.somedomainname.com. IOW it would have a different "base" name (ns) than > eth0 (gentoo). My question is whether or not this is valid/"legal"/okay, > i.e. is it likely to cause any problems?
I do not see why this would be forbidden, however I think it would be a good idea to let gentoo.somedomainname.com resolv to the same IP as ns.somedomainname.com. Or better, ns be a pointer to gentoo (if that is possible, I'm not sure here). It is for clarity and - well, this one is crazy, but it IMO adds to the computer's "personality" and the computer deserves a proper name. With regards. -- Hallowed be the zeroes and ones Michal "vorner" Vaner
pgp17T5LMitJF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
