Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > no, I trust the kernel devs how said, that a swapfile in 2.6 should not be > slower.
"should not" is not the same as "is not" I better trust my own experiences... > > /dev/swap-device none swap sw 0 0 > > > > (Note mount-point is none.) > > you 'activate it', which is pretty similar to mounting. Yup. And a swapfile needs mounting and activating. Best regards, Norberto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
