On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote 
about '[gentoo-user]  Re: cdrtools incomplete?':
> Leonhard Gruener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 schrieb Kevin O'Gorman:
> >> On 5/6/07, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > 070506 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >> > > I'm trying to burn a CD for the first time in a long while.
> >> > > It's not going well.  I've got cdrtools-2.01.01-alpha10
> >> > > installed. The description says it includes cdrecord, but I
> >> > > cannot find it.
> >
> > So install cdrkit.
>
> The "real" cdrecord
> is from cdrtools, though.

I'm pretty sure the one in cdrkit is real.  Either that or I'm only 
imagining that I burned and used my last rescue CD. *boggle*

:)

Just to be clear, cdrkit is a fork off of an older version of cdrtools that 
was made because Debian doesn't believe cdrtools to be distributable by 
anyone other than the copyright holder since parts are licensed under the 
GPL and parts are under the (GPL-incompatible) CDDL.  The issue is further 
since the work isn't from an single author (contributions licensed under 
the GPL from others have been integrated) AND at least one party involved 
believes the GPL and CDDL to be compatible.

That doesn't make cdrkit less real, but it does mean that you'll probably 
have fewer issues using cdrtools.  (I use cdrkit and have never had any 
problems with it; YMMV.)

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to