On Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:30 -0400, Denis wrote: > After reading some docs, the impression I get is that the 'nocona' > flag is for building a 64-bit system... For a 32-bit system, it seems > like 'prescott' would be the choice, wouldn't it?
Yes. > We don't have gcc-4.2.0 in our portage available for installation yet, > do we? Anyone know when? When the devs consider it suitable for at least the testing branch or when you do "echo =sys-devel/gcc-4.2*" >>/etc/portage/package.mask, whichever comes sooner. Bear in mind that GCC is almost certainly masked for good reason. It's not like you're using a binary distro and only need a compiler for a few packages. Feel free to try it in the knowledge that if it breaks your system, you get to keep the pieces. -- Neil Bothwick Sects, sects, sects, is that all you monks think about?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
