On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 04:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses 
> with --package-names because of the lack of support for the 
> =category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still 
> supports.. :)

Hey, I'm proud of that horrible hack!

However, on that note, I can't wait to get rid of it and use the
=category/package-version:slot syntax. I've been strongly thinking of
doing it in 0.2.4 which is in the pre-release cycle right now.

Regards,
Paul
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to