On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 04:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses > with --package-names because of the lack of support for the > =category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still > supports.. :)
Hey, I'm proud of that horrible hack! However, on that note, I can't wait to get rid of it and use the =category/package-version:slot syntax. I've been strongly thinking of doing it in 0.2.4 which is in the pre-release cycle right now. Regards, Paul -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list