On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: > > In <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get > > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. > > > > > > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? > > > > > > I did. > > > > > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the > > > bug as a real bug... > > > > I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but > > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to > > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it, > > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices. > > Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he > filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option > to get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;) > > His user interface could be improved....
Maybe someone should submit a bug report.... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
