Hi, On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:29:41 -0400 "John Blinka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used interactive bootup as you suggested, and discovered that > the system is not even attempting to start them, even though > rc-update thinks they're supposed to be started at the "default" > runlevel. I can start them by hand without any errors, so the lack > of messages in the logs isn't surprising. Can you provide the full output of "rc-update show"? > Since all of those daemons depend on network: Are there network > > settings for interfaces that fail on boot up? > > Network works fine. Does that mean: "No there are no failing network related things on boot up"? -hwh -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
