Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:05 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > The alternative would
> > > be to use a separate /boot and mess around with initramfs images to
> > > load / from LVM, which is extra hassle and another potential point of
> > > failure.
> >
> > Want my scripts? ;-)
>
> I'd be interested to see them, although I like the idea of not depending
> on an initrd. As I no longer run a separate /boot, it wouldn't reduce my
> partition count either.

I see. What I do is to embed the initramfs into the kernel image. Works fine 
as long as everything you need to setup / is compiled into the kernel 
statically. There's also one scenario where separating / and /boot has a 
clear advantage: Laptops with complete HD encryption. The only partition 
you can leave unencrypted is the small /boot, everything else can be 
encrypted (which means, you only need the passphrase for the / volume, 
everything else can be unlocked via keyfiles stored on this 
partition/volume. In this case you need an intrd/intramfs (the latter is 
far easier to handle) anyway and can put / on an LV.

Oh, my scripts will reach you soon.

Bye...

        Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs          | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanheimerstraße 68      | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf      | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to