2007/7/16, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On July 15, 2007 03:09:41 pm »Q« wrote: > I emerged netscape-flash-9.0.48.0 before it was masked. I assume that > emerge got the correct tarball, else it would have been caught by the > checksum checking, and because about:plugins in Firefox says > "File name: libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 9.0 r48". > > I guess I'm seeking reassurance that my understanding is correct, that > I have the version with the vulnerability fixed. I can't tell you if you've got the "right" one, but I can warn you not to un-merge it... there doesn't appear to be a replacement available just yet :-)
I've uninstall netscape-flash because of a problem with files in my ~/.mozilla/plugins/ but, now it's hard masked, do I (we) have to use the media-libs/libflash instead ? thx for advice
