> > Three of my systems are having package management trouble.  One of the
> > systems does this after revdep-rebuild:
> >
> > All ebuilds that could satisfy "=sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1" have been masked.
> >
> Please post the output of: eix sys-devel/gcc

# eix sys-devel/gcc
[D] sys-devel/gcc
     Available versions:
        (2.95)  2.95.3-r9 ~2.95.3-r10
        (3.1)   3.1.1-r2
        (3.2)   **3.2.2 3.2.3-r4
        (3.3)   3.3.2-r7 3.3.5-r1 3.3.5.20050130-r1 3.3.6 3.3.6-r1
        (3.4)   ~3.4.1-r3 3.4.4-r1 3.4.5 3.4.5-r1 ~3.4.6 3.4.6-r1 3.4.6-r2
        (4.0)   [M]~*4.0.3 [M]~*4.0.4
        (4.1)   [M]~4.1.0-r1 [M]4.1.1 [M]4.1.1-r1 [M]4.1.1-r3 [M]4.1.2
        (4.2)   [M]~4.2.0
        {X altivec bootstrap boundschecking build d doc fortran gcj
gtk hardened ip28 ip32r10k java mudflap multilib multislot n32 n64 nls
nocxx nopie nossp objc objc++ objc-gc openmp static test vanilla}
     Installed versions:  3.3.6-r1(3.3)(14:15:16 02/23/07)(-altivec
-bootstrap -boundschecking -build -doc -fortran -gcj -gtk hardened
-ip28 -ip32r10k -multilib -multislot -n32 -n64 -nls -nocxx -nopie
-nossp -objc -test -vanilla)
                          3.4.6-r2(3.4)(18:12:38 03/15/07)(-altivec
-bootstrap -boundschecking -build -d -doc -fortran -gcj -gtk hardened
-ip28 -ip32r10k -multilib -multislot -n32 -n64 -nls -nocxx -nopie
-nossp -objc -test -vanilla)
                          4.1.1(4.1)(04:58:00 09/06/06)(-altivec
-bootstrap -build -doc -fortran gcj gtk hardened -ip28 -ip32r10k
-mudflap -multilib -multislot -n32 -n64 -nls -nocxx -objc -objc++
-objc-gc -test -vanilla)
     Homepage:            http://gcc.gnu.org/
     Description:         The GNU Compiler Collection. Includes C/C++,
java compilers, pie+ssp extensions, Haj Ten Brugge runtime bounds
checking

[I] sys-devel/gcc-config
     Available versions:  1.3.13-r4 1.3.14 1.3.15-r1 1.3.16 **1.4.0
[M]~2.0.0_rc1
     Installed versions:  1.3.16(09:14:29 05/05/07)
     Homepage:            http://www.gentoo.org/
     Description:         Utility to configure the active toolchain compiler

* sys-devel/gcc-nios2
     Available versions:  (nios2-elf-3.4)  ~5.1
        {multislot test}
     Homepage:            http://gcc.gnu.org/
     Description:         Compiler for Nios2 targets

Found 3 matches.

> and: ls -ld /etc/make.profile

# ls -ld /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 56 Oct  1  2006 /etc/make.profile ->
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1/desktop

> > but I don't know why it wants a masked version of gcc.  Another system
> > wants to unmerge a bunch of crucial stuff with --depclean, including:
> >
> > x11-base/xorg-x11
> > selected: 7.1
> > protected: none
> > omitted: none
> >
> > x11-apps/xdm
> > selected: 1.0.5
> > protected: none
> > omitted: none
> >
> Manually put both in: /var/lib/portage/world file (backup it, just in
> case).
> Seems you had "virtual/x11" which pulled all dependencies, but not
> anymore.

I don't understand why they weren't depended on by gdm and (for
example) firefox which are in my world file.

> > If I do a pretend emerge of xorg-x11 and xdm, it want to upgrade a
> > bunch of packages but 'emerge -pDuN world' find nothing.  I have this:
> >
> > # equery depends xorg-x11
> > [ Searching for packages depending on xorg-x11... ]
> > virtual/x11-7.0-r2 (>=x11-base/xorg-x11-7)
> >
> > The other system outputs a bunch of libtiff.la stuff about ImageMagick like:
> >
> > broken /usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.2/modules-Q16/filters/analyze.la
> > (requires /usr/lib/libtiff.la)
> >
> Do you have a "tiff" USE-flag set ?

# eix imagemagick
[I] media-gfx/imagemagick
     Available versions:  6.3.0.5 6.3.0.5-r1 6.3.3 ~6.3.4 6.3.4-r1 {X
bzip2 doc fpx graphviz gs hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms mpeg nocxx
openexr perl png q32 q8 tiff truetype wmf xml zlib}
     Installed versions:  6.3.4-r1(16:38:20 06/25/07)(-X bzip2 -doc
-fpx -graphviz -gs -hdri -jbig jpeg -jpeg2k lcms -mpeg -nocxx -openexr
perl png -q32 -q8 -tiff truetype -wmf xml zlib)
     Homepage:            http://www.imagemagick.org/
     Description:         A collection of tools and libraries for many
image formats

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to