On Tuesday 21 August 2007 08:48:06 Mick wrote: > > Just updated udev to 114 and it left me an einfo with the following: > > > > "You still have the directory /etc/dev.d on your system. This is no > > longer used by udev and can be removed." > > > > However I _DO NOT_ have an /etc/dev.d. > > > > Should I file a bug report on this? > > I've posted an identical message a day ago but did not get a response > (yet). Not sure if it made it to the list. Do you have a /etc/devfs.d/ > instead?
Both messages made it to the list. Looking at the code in the ebuild I don't see how this is possible (and hence how there could be a bug to fix). It does *not* test for /etc/devfs.d. If both of you are sure /etc/dev.d doesn't exist *and* if it's reproducible then by all means go ahead and file a bug. For diagnostics emerge --debug -1 udev should do.. -- Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
