071029 Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
>> Unrecognised deviceID 29c2
>> backtrace ...
>> ... /usr/lib64/dri/i915_dri.so ... (provided by pkg 'mesa')
> What versions of Mesa and xf86-video-i810 are you running?
'mesa-progs-6.5.2' (latest available).
'xf86-video-i810-2.1.0' ( 2.1.1 is in testing (~)).
> And what is in the Section "Device" of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf?
Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
Option "Accel" "On" # [<bool>]
#Option "SWcursor" # [<bool>]
#Option "ColorKey" # <i>
#Option "CacheLines" # <i>
#Option "Dac6Bit" # [<bool>]
#Option "DRI" "true" # [<bool>]
#Option "NoDDC" # [<bool>]
#Option "ShowCache" # [<bool>]
#Option "XvMCSurfaces" # <i>
#Option "PageFlip" # [<bool>]
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "Integrated Graphics Controller"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
This is the result of 'X -config' (with a small format change).
I tried permutations of Options suggested on Forum posts without success
(I haven't asked on the Forum myself): eg adding 'Option "DRI" "true"',
which seems merely to duplicate "Accel" above.
I am a bit confused by the requirement for 2 drivers i810 i915 .
The same dir has i810_dri.so i915tex_dri.so i965_dri.so (all from Mesa).
Is it using the wrong driver ? Is there a way to test the others ?
Thanks again for your response.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
