On Thursday 20 December 2007, Dan Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:40:48 -0600 > > Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Philip Webb wrote: > > > 071218 Sergey Kobzar wrote: > > >> - ReiserFS looks unsupported now > > > > > > What do you base that assessment on ? It's true > > > that RFS 4 was going nowhere even before its creator's legal > > > problems, but RFS 3 is still well-supported as a Gentoo pkg, isn't > > > it ? When I installed Gentoo on my new desktop machine recently, > > > I used RFS 3 for everything except /boot (which is Ext2). > > > > I too use ReiserFS for everything but /boot. I used to use it for > > that but the 32MB thing sort of got me to change it to ext3. I have > > had no problems with file system errors. I have three hard drives > > and 9 partitions, 8 are ReiserFS, and it works great. I may even give > > ReiserFS 4 a shot in the future. I'm not sure if it is even being > > developed any more tho. Anybody hear anything on that? > > > > Dale > > > > :-) :-) :-) > > I, too, use reiserfs for everything I can. EXT3, the last time I used > it, is much slower, Sure, you can tweak it, but you can do that to > Reiser too. I trust it now, and don't intend to switch to anything > else any time soon. > > I have always found this FS review well presented and very useful: > http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388
Hmm, this article suggests that XFS is the best thing since sliced bread . . . especially for files greater than 500MB. Not sure I've got many of these. Has anyone got a particularly good experience with XFS vs e.g. Reiserfs? What about JFS? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
