On Thursday 20 December 2007, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Thanks, I'll browse through these.
>
> It makes me wonder if the drives are "sensitive" to something.  This
> seems to be common with Maxtor.  Is Hitachi made by the same company as
> Maxtor I wonder?
>
> I have been getting these errors for some time now.  They pass the tests
> tho.  You can run that with this:  smartctl -t long /dev/hdX  The X
> should be replaced with the correct drive or you may have to use sdX if
> you have SATA drives.  After it gets done, which may take a while, you
> can get the results like this:  smartctl -l selftest /dev/hdX.  Replace
> the X again.
>
> Hope you get a good report.  Mine passed.

All the tests that I have run so far seem to pass:
===================================================
# smartctl -l selftest /dev/hda
smartctl version 5.37 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  
LBA_of_first_error
# 1  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      5912         -
# 2  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      1030         -
# 3  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      1029         -
# 4  Short offline       Completed without error       00%        49         -
# 5  Short offline       Completed without error       00%        28         -
# 6  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         0         -
===================================================

It's about time I made a back up of this machine anyway.

Thanks for your help.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to