On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:47:36 +0000 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to > > untar or something similar. I fail to see the point. > > That's because you are assuming that all file corruption is > accidental, whereas the manifest system is designed to protect > against malicious corruption. > > > I also remember why I hate this mailing list and usually just mark > > all read. > > That is safer that advising people to override portage's security > precautions. > > You're right I was assuming it was accidental. I also falsely assumed he already tried another mirror of the file. I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :> On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks claws when it tries to thread it if there are unread :9. May need to nuke it and regenerate everything from scratch. -- Ken69267 Gentoo AMD64 AT
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
