Well, that would certainly help to trace the problem with pulseaudio, yes. But I must admit that I'm hoping someone here has a more pleasant suggestion. Something like a magical solution or that obvious shot I'd never think about =)
Anyway, I don't believe that it's really a pulseaudio bug, so I'm afraid to file a bug for it, but I'm beggining to change my mind =( On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Ophidian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gustavo Campos wrote: > > > My point is: > > > > Is there any way to tell pulseaudio not to eat my cpu that much? > > Or better: Is there a solution that would allow me to be a happy child > > without having to use pulseaudio and it's extra layer between me and > > my beloved hardware? > > > > You guys can't imagine how much I played with google and alsa without > > solution before I surrended to pulseaudio. If you show me a better > > solution I'll feel myself stupid, but happy. > > > > You might get your best results if you email Lennart and/or open a ticket > at http://pulseaudio.org/ > > Aaron > -- > "The goblins are in charge of maintenance? Why not just set it on fire now > and call it a day?" > --Whip Tongue, Viashino Technician > -- > [email protected] mailing list > > -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- [email protected] mailing list
