On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: > > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/base > >>lay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 > > > > oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that. > > No need for a rev bump here i guess! Anybody who runs into this will not > benefit from a rev bump, as the files were gone and are not restored by > the bump.
yes, need for a rev bump. If one person has a problem and another person does not have the problem, it is helpfull to be able to determine the exact version of the packet installed. Not bumping revs makes that harder. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
