On 2008-05-12, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A curiosity: by itself, the Hawking USB adapter has more or
>> less sensitivity than the simple Airport glued to my Macbook
>> motherboard?
>
> I think it depends a lot on the maturity of the drivers. As I
> said, my Netgear PCI card uses the madwifi drivers and vastly
> outperforms the Hawking adapter.
What do you mean by "outperform"? I can see how drivers can
affect throughput. The Windows drivers for my Laptop's WiFi
chipset (Intel Pro-something) only get about 1/4 of the
bandwidth that the Linux drivers do.
But, I don't understand how the driver can affect receiver
sensitivity. That's purely a function of the design of the RF
frontend.
> The Hawking's drivers are fairly new (rt2x00) and madwifi has
> been around for quite a while now.
>
> I do have another rt2x00 adapter that performs noticeably
> worse than the Hawking. It's a Linksys and it has no external
> antenna.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Zippy's brain cells
at are straining to bridge
visi.com synapses ...
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
