Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reality, regardless of what Debian, or the FSF, or you,
> or any lawyers say, is that the licensing issue has not been
> tested in court yet. Unless and until that happens, the
> whole debate is pure theory. Debian is clearly not willing
> to take the risk of being sued by someone for violating
> their copyright. If Debian is willing to settle for a far
> inferior product just to avoid that risk, that's their right
> as distributors. You have made it abundantly clear that you
> disagree with their position, so there is not much else to do.
This is not true!
There are license violations in other packages from Debian where
I _could_ sue Debian.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
[email protected] mailing list
