On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:25:02 +0200
"b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Murray ha scritto:
> > "b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Justin ha scritto:
> >>> I can't answer your last question but give you an advice how to
> >>> handle the ff upgrade. Just remove all firefox useflags and add
> >>> the xulrunner instead.
> >> Huh? What if I need java and moznopango ?
> >
> > What you have to do is to remove the 'firefox' USE flag from all
> > other ebuilds. You do not have to remove the use flags from the
> > mozilla-firefox ebuild.
>
> Oh, ok! I understand now.
> Why is it so?
OOo 2.4.1 depends on the Mozilla 1.8 libraries, which it can get
from either Fx 2 or xulrunner 1.8.x.
Fx 3 uses Mozilla 1.9 libs (which are also available in
xulrunner 1.9.x).
> Will need to be done also when firefox 3 hits stable x86?
I believe the reason xulrunner is slotted is so that there's always
something that can supply dependencies. I'm not sure what the plan is
for stabilizing Fx 3.
--
»Q«
Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.
