On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:26:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Since the best solution to this exception is to finish that part of > > the task which is not influenced by this error, I think the > > expectation for this exception is clear. > > "Which is not influenced" - this is the crucial clause, the one that is > fraught with error. Who is to say what "not influenced" actually means? > A complete lack of any related dependencies is one workable way to > scope it. It happens often enough that it's worth the effort to > accommodate it.
Isn't that exactly what --keep-going does, skips and packages that depends on the failed package and merge the rest? -- Neil Bothwick "Bother," said Christopher Robin, as Pooh got out the vaseline.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
