Am Wednesday 08 October 2008 06:50:47 schrieb Willie Wong:
>   I don't remember gcc-3 being such a resource hog when building. So I
>   wonder: is this the expected behaviour or is something wrong with my
>   box?

Expected behaviour. >=gcc-4.2 compiles about three times longer than <gcc-4.2 
(IIRC 4.1.2 was the last gcc that I could compile in under 30 minutes; the 
current one takes about 1.5 hours), and requires loads of disk.

-- 
Heiko Wundram

Reply via email to