On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 02:23:55PM +0200, Geralt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Geralt wrote: > >> Although it would be possible to include this respawning into slim > >> (and I suppose that gdm and kdm have this feature?) it is much more > >> work than checking in xdm is slim is still up and if not restarting it > >> (since xdm is slim's parent process it gets even informed about it, so > >> no polling would be necessary!). > > > > xdm isn't slim's parent process, slim is a replacement for xdm. Or do > > you mean the xdm init script? > I meant the xdm init script, since I thought we were talking all the > time about the xdm init script when saying xdm. Did I misunderstand > something in the previous posts?
No, I just wasn't absolutely sure. "xdm" was mentioned once as "/etc/init.d/xdm", once someone said something about "a xdm". -- hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm4l7Gi2e2t4b7Ken4/7a16s0r1p-5.62/-6.56g5OR
