On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:55 PM, b.n. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Hartman ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Paul Hartman
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
>>> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
>>> this:
>>>
>>> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>>>
>>> I also --depclean on a regular basis to remove any unneeded packages.
>>> Right now, it tells me this:
>>>
>>> No packages selected for removal by depclean
>>>
>>> Based on those two commands, I'm led to believe I have a fully updated
>>> system. So, then, I am curious why when I do "emerge -e @world" it
>>> tells me this:
>>>
>>> Total: 1432 packages (9 upgrades, 2 downgrades, 14 new, 1407
>>> reinstalls, 1 interactive), Size of downloads: 76,235 kB
>>>
>>> How is that possible? Where do those upgrades, downgrades and new
>>> packages come from? What is missing from my traditional "-uDvN"
>>> command that is causing me to miss some of those updates?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul
>>
>> Before anyone responds I will throw in my theory :)
>>
>> I'm using ~amd64 and I suppose perhaps the ebuilds have changed since
>> I installed them, but have not had a version increase.
>
> It's 4 years I'm using Gentoo and I can still be surprised by it. :)
> This doesn't look right. Why do devs upgrade ebuilds and do not increase
> the -rX versioning?
>
> m.
>
>

Good question. If you look at the ChangeLog from openoffice-3.0.0 you
can see it was marked stable on x86 & amd64 in 18 Oct 2008 but the
ebuild has had some dramatic changes in the time since then, including
bug fixes, patches, etc.

My /guess/ is that since OpenOffice is such a huge package, if they
bump the -r1 -r2 -r3 very often and people have 9 hours of compiling
each time, it will annoy the gentoo population. So, instead, they use
the idea that if nothing is gained by someone with a working
openoffice, no reason to fix it (but if someone had a problem they can
just "re-emerge openoffice and see if it works now").

Reply via email to