> I'm not very familiar with g-cpan and I just realized I should be
> running 'g-cpan -u' along with 'emerge --sync'. When I run 'g-cpan
> -u', the last chunk of output is:
>
> Warning: prerequisite version 0 not found.
> Could not eval '
> package ExtUtils::MakeMaker::_version;
> no strict;
>
> local $VERSION;
> $VERSION=undef; do {
> use version; our $VERSION = qv('1.13');
> }; $VERSION
> ' in lib/Google/Adwords.pm: Can't locate version.pm in @INC (@INC
> contains: /etc/perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i686-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8
> /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 94) line 7, <FH> line 5.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 94) line 7, <FH> line 5.
> WARNING: Setting VERSION via file 'lib/Google/Adwords.pm' failed
> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 515
> Use of uninitialized value in hash element at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/Portage.pm line 72.
> Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/Portage.pm line 80.
> Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/Portage.pm line 81.
> Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/Portage.pm line 81.
> * Ebuild already exists for Test-Class (dev-perl/Test-Class)
> | Is already unwrapped into directory
> /var/tmp/g-cpan/.cpan/build/Test-MockModule-0.05
> Insufficient permissions! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/CPAN.pm line 172.
>
> Is that a problem?
>
> - Grant
I disappeared a lot of this by running 'g-cpan version', but I still get:
* Ebuild already exists for Test-Class (dev-perl/Test-Class)
| Is already unwrapped into directory
/var/tmp/g-cpan/.cpan/build/Test-MockModule-0.05
Insufficient permissions! at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Gentoo/CPAN.pm line 172.
Is that ignorable?
- Grant
