"Arttu V." <arttu...@gmail.com> writes: > Is there a reason to use i486 stage3? I think an i686 one might have > been available and a better hit if your system is/was set up as an i686 > before this? Well, not that it counts now, gotta go with what you have > unpacked.
Looking at those stages again... it is not apparent in any way that I should have gotten something besides x86. I see there is an i686. But apparently I was to slow to figure out that I needed it. Thanks ... I'm working thru the CHOST doc now.
