No, you *add* qt4 to your make.conf if you need it. You probably still have packages that use qt3, so unless you want to unmerge them...
Think of it this way. Nobody in their right mind will ever get qt and gtk+ confused. You can have both and intermingle them, and the flags do not depend on each other. Qt and Qt4 are just like that, they are that different. You cannot upgrade a Qt app to use Qt4 (unless you are willing to use some compat layer), just as you cannot upgrade a Qt app to use GTK+ -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:24:32 Anthony Mutiso wrote: > So for those that *had* qt in make.conf, (like me), the right thing to > do is to change it to qt4? > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Yes. The difference is huge. > > > > KDE-3 uses Qt > > KDE-4 uses Qt4 > > > > > > They are so different that a name change from Qt to something else would > > be entirely acceptable.
