Post #2 from Mr. McKinnon is the question. If, as it sounds like, you didn't let revdep-rebuild go ahead and reemerge those packages itself, but rather you reemerged them yourself, then I believe you will need to `revdep-rebuild -i` (see manpage) to see if it has any other complaints. And there's nothing unusual about broken dependencies after library upgrades... just let revdep-rebuild rebuild the necessary packages for you, that's why it's there.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:04 AM, walt<w41...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/03/2009 07:39 AM, econti wrote: >> >> Hi all >> after two months I made a world upgrade. All went well, but when I ran >> "revdep-rebuild" I received this: >> >> localhost ~ # revdep-rebuild >> * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild >> >> * Checking reverse dependencies >> * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update >> * will be emerged. >> >> * Collecting system binaries and libraries >> * Generated new 1_files.rr >> * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH >> * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr >> * Checking dynamic linking consistency >> [ 46% ] * broken >> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libstdc++.la (requires >> -lgcc_s_32) >> * broken /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libsupc++.la >> (requires -lgcc_s_32) >> [ 51% ] * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lneatogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ldotgen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ltwopigen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lfdpgen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcircogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lneatogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lneatogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgdtclft.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgvrender.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ldotgen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltwopigen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lfdpgen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcircogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lneatogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcommon) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtclplan.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltkstub8.4) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lneatogen) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lgvrender) >> * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lcommon) >> [ 64% ] * broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -ldb1) >> * broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -lxml) > > Looks like all of those files are left over from older versions > and need to be deleted. If you check the dates on those files > I think you will see that they are very old, and there are no > libraries that match those *la files. > > >
