On 09/06/2009 05:10 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 06 September 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/06/2009 03:50 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
and maybe you should decrapify your config a bit? Namespaces? Seccomp?
Process accounting? no compat vdso?

You really hate performance, do you?

On another note:

"Say N here if you are running a sufficiently recent glibc version
(2.3.3 or later), to remove the high-mapped VDSO mapping and to
exclusively use the randomized VDSO."

And digging turned up that it saves about 6-10 instructions per syscall
but limits the flexibility.  This may be a significant improvement for
intensive-IO processes.

And about process accounting:

"This is generally a good idea, so say Y."

yeah, if you are in a bean counter environment. Nobody else needs it.


Well, I said Y.

And on seccomp:

"... If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here."

Well, guess what?  I'm not on "embedded".

and seccomp is only used by a single project by Andrea Arcangeli. Nobody else
uses it. He also was the submitter of that feature.

I've used your .config. I only changed CPU from AMD to Intel Core 2, as well as the SATA and network drivers. Same problems.

So it's not a kernel configuration problem.

And btw, no matter how I configure the kernel, Con's scheduler always results in a smooth and fluid composited GUI. Bte, are you even using OpenGL compositing or are you just talking random stuff? :P


Reply via email to