On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:15:29 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Good catch Volker. I didn't notice that part. He needs to become > >> very familiar with the -1 option but even that is not good in every > >> case. If it is a package that needs to be in world, then that option > >> shouldn't be used either otherwise a --depclean would remove it.
> > He's updating, so packages that need to be in world are already there. > If he is using the command he typed in, his world file is going to be > huge. Read what he wrote again. He is doing the updates individually > without a -u or a -1 or anything else. That means every time he > updates, that package goes into the world file. I read, and understood, what he wrote, even if it turned out to be not wheat he meant. I was responding to your "If it is a package that needs to be in world, then that option shouldn't be used either otherwise a --depclean would remove it." which is not true if the package is already in world. -- Neil Bothwick If Microsoft made cars: "The airbag system would ask "are you sure?" before deploying."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
